I am one of those odd cases and agree with Gian on both accounts. -----Original Message----- From: Gian Merlino <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 11:15 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [druid-dev] any reason to still keep overlord as separate node?
Hi Prashant, The only issue that I can think of is that in some (super large) clusters, the coordinator and overlord can both be pretty demanding in terms of memory and it helps for scalability to have them be separate. But this is not the common case - most clusters are smaller or medium sized. So it makes sense for the default to be combining them. I would support a patch that changed the defaults and updated the docs accordingly. Btw, since we are trying to migrate the dev mailing list to Apache, please cross post this sort of thing with [email protected], or even only post to that list. Gian On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Prashant Deva <[email protected]> wrote: > i feel atleast the documentation should be written to assume that > overlord+coordinator is the default config and separate overlord is > overlord+the > 'legacy' one. > > is there any actual issues holding keeping overlord as separate node? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Druid Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/ms > gid/druid-development/2d22212b-23dc-4654-9b48-df8439cb62ad% > 40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/2d22212b-23dc-465 > 4-9b48-df8439cb62ad%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=foo > ter> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
