I backported 5504 and 5587. I skipped 5374 since it turns out it isn't
relevant to 0.12.0 -- it fixes something introduced since then -- so I
moved that back to 0.13.0.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote:

> I raised backport PRs for everything on my list except for these three,
> since they had some (minor) conflicts and I was using a backport script
> that bails out if it sees any conflicts:
>
> - https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5504
> - https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5587
> - https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5374
>
> I will take a closer look at them later if nobody else gets to them.
>
> Nishant, I added https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5596 to the
> milestone.
>
> Prashant, I added https://github.com/druid-io/druid/pull/5611 to the
> milestone.
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Prashant Deva <prashant.d...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> also for the list:
>>
>> - compact task throws exception #5611
>>
>> i dont have permission to add to gian's github milestone
>>
>> Prashant
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Gian Merlino <gianmerl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Here we go: https://github.com/druid-io/druid/milestone/26. Please add
>> > stuff if it makes sense (high importance / low risk bug fixes).
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Gian Merlino <gianmerl...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > It looks like there's a lot of support for doing a 0.12.1… I'll make a
>> > > milestone in GH.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Slim Bouguerra <bs...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +1 especially there is some instability bugs.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Apr 9, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> My feeling is that #3 and #2 are borderline, but #1 definitely
>> warrants
>> > a
>> > >> new release. Personally I have seen it occur at least a half dozen
>> > times,
>> > >> and I had been thinking about proposing a Druid 0.12.1 release, so
>> I'm
>> > >> glad
>> > >> you brought it up.
>> > >>
>> > >> If we do 0.12.1, it would be another non-ASF release (we haven't got
>> the
>> > >> ASF process set up yet, and are not likely to have it set up in
>> time) so
>> > >> we
>> > >> should notify the incubator folks about it.
>> > >>
>> > >> I would also consider including these fixes in 0.12.1:
>> > >>
>> > >> - DoublesSketchModule: Fix serde for DoublesSketchMergeAggregatorFa
>> > ctory.
>> > >> (#5587)
>> > >> - ArrayAggregation: Use long to avoid overflow (#5544)
>> > >> - Respect forceHashAggregation in queryContext (#5533)
>> > >> - Fix indexTask to respect forceExtendableShardSpecs (#5509)
>> > >> - Add overlord unsecured paths to coordinator when using combined
>> > service
>> > >> (#5579)
>> > >> - Fix SQLMetadataSegmentManager to allow succesive start and stop
>> > (#5554)
>> > >> - Fix supervisor tombstone auth handling (#5504)
>> > >> - Authorize supervisor history instead of current active supervisors
>> for
>> > >> supervisor history API (#5501)
>> > >> - Fix round robining in router. (#5500)
>> > >> - SegmentMetadataQuery: Fix default interval handling. (#5489)
>> > >> - Log exceptions thrown before persist() for indexing tasks (#5374)
>> > >> - More memory limiting for HttpPostEmitter (#5300)
>> > >> - pass configuration from context into JobConf for determining
>> > >> DatasourceInputFormat splits (#5408)
>> > >> - Lookups: Inherit "injective" from registered lookups, improve docs.
>> > >> (#5316)
>> > >> - SQL: Throttle metadata refreshes when they fail. (#5328)
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Gian Merlino <g...@imply.io> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> I think this conversation is worth having. I have cross posted this
>> to
>> > >> dev@druid.apache.org and will reply there. Since we're trying to
>> > migrate
>> > >> the dev list, please cross post any dev messages there, or even only
>> > post
>> > >> to that list.
>> > >>
>> > >> Gian
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Prashant Deva <
>> prashant.d...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Current 0.12.0 release has some major issues:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>   1. Coordinator loses leadership
>> > >>   https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/5561
>> > >>
>> > >>   2. Newly introduced Quantiles sketch is broken
>> > >>   https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/5575
>> > >>
>> > >>   3. Coordinator+overlord web console broken
>> > >>   https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/5559
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> 1. is especially very important. Without a coordinator, druid stops
>> > >> functioning.
>> > >> With bug 5561, it is impossible to use druid for long periods since
>> > >> coordinator eventually does lose leadership and the whole process
>> needs
>> > to
>> > >> be restarted for it to come back.
>> > >>
>> > >> *Why not wait till 0.13.0?*
>> > >>
>> > >> A lot of companies like to update one version at a time and may not
>> want
>> > >> to jump directly to 0.13.0.
>> > >> Those companies will hit a bad surprise due to bug 5561 essentially
>> > >> rendering the cluster useless in production.
>> > >> Also quantiles being the new feature and broken does not look good
>> > either.
>> > >>
>> > >> 0.12.0 is a 'release', not an RC, thus marking it good for
>> production,
>> > >> but the bugs listed above prevent it from being used as such.
>> > >> I highly recommend 0.12.1 release, thus marking the right version to
>> > >> upgrade to from 0.11.0
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > >> "Druid Development" group.
>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send
>> > an
>> > >> email to druid-development+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > >> To post to this group, send email to druid-development@googlegroups
>> .com
>> > .
>> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>> > >> gid/druid-development/165b491e-3ec2-4744-a228-d1270c9d283a%4
>> > >> 0googlegroups.com
>> > >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/
>> > >> 165b491e-3ec2-4744-a228-d1270c9d283a%40googlegroups.
>> > >> com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> > >> .
>> > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > >> "Druid Development" group.
>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send
>> > an
>> > >> email to druid-development+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > >> To post to this group, send email to druid-development@googlegroups
>> .com
>> > .
>> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/
>> > >> msgid/druid-development/CACZNdYDbTjn%2BVZfnK-zuugw_
>> > >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/
>> > CACZNdYDbTjn%2BVZfnK-zuugw_>
>> > >> E1efUNu2F4G%2BJTZJa0h7J-iK3w%40mail.gmail.com
>> > >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/druid-development/
>> > >> CACZNdYDbTjn%2BVZfnK-zuugw_E1efUNu2F4G%2BJTZJa0h7J-iK3w%
>> > >> 40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> > >> .
>> > >>
>> > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to