If I'm in a view where I see both feature request issues and pull requests,
I think it's nice to be able to tell right away what the issue type is.

If someone creates a feature request like "Add <feature-name>", that title
also works as a pull request title, I see no reason to have that ambiguity.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 1:32 PM Roman Leventov <leventov...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Code contributions are PRs, they could be filtered via is:pr (or is:issue
> if you want the opposite) in issue search on Github, isn't that enough?
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 23:03, Jonathan Wei <jon...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > "Problem Report" sounds fine to me, maybe we could have an automatically
> > assigned "Problem Report" tag and a separate "Bug" tag. In general I want
> > to have [TAG] or github labels on issues for easy identification.
> >
> > For the feature requests, I think they should be tagged automatically for
> > easy visibility, and you make a fair point re: "Wish list". I would
> suggest
> > "Feature/Change Request" as the label text (or some other word with
> similar
> > meaning as "request" if that's too similar to "pull request"), to make it
> > clear that those issues are not code contributions.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:24 PM Roman Leventov <leven...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I suggest renaming "Bug Report" to "Problem Report" (and not
> > automatically
> > > assign a "bug" tag) because sometimes the problems that are reported by
> > > users are not the result of bugs in Druid, but, for example, misuse,
> > > misconfiguration, use of old Druid version, etc. Druid committer
> assigns
> > a
> > > "bug" tag when he reads the issue and verifies that it's probably
> caused
> > by
> > > a bug.
> > >
> > > I also suggest removing "Wish list" tag and not assign it in
> > > "Feature/Change request" template automatically. Or rename it to
> > objective
> > > "Feature", or "Feature/Change". "Wish list" is subjunctive - who wishes
> > > that change? The author? The community?
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to