These two opinions are reasonable. Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 2:48 PM Gian Merlino <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe that automated reviews are going to be helpful to the project. I > have seen them in use on some internal repositories and they are generally > a useful additional line of defense for code quality. Thanks for starting > up an experiment. > > I would ask two things. First, please disclose in the reviews that they > are automated. A simple disclaimer in the review like "This is an automated > review, please ping me with feedback" would suffice. Second, I don't think > automated reviews should approve PRs using GitHub's approval feature. That > approval should be done by a human being. > > Gian > > On 2026/04/27 14:34:13 Frank Chen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to let you know that I’m using Codex GPT-5.5 to run scheduled > > reviews every weekday against open PRs in this repository on behalf of > me. > > > > The intent is to provide an additional review pass focused on correctness > > risks, regressions, compatibility issues, and missing edge cases, > > and expedite the acceptance of PRs. > > > > Codex may post review comments directly on PRs when it finds something > > actionable, or approve/comment when no issues are found. > > Please treat these comments like any other automated or assisted review > > feedback: useful when they identify a real issue, > > but still subject to human verification and project maintainers’ final > > decision. > > > > If this workflow causes noise or should follow a different convention for > > this repo, please let me know. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Frank > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
