In some places I see there are reference of code which is under
*com.alibaba.fastjson,
*as part of release process should we also consider rewriting them or
providing license from the owner org?



On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 8:15 AM Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> wrote:

> Nice work!
>
> I think we should let the community to participate more in the release
> process, for example,
> 1. check out a release branch called 2.7.0-release
> 2. encourage people to check it out, test it and report if there is
> any regressions, bugs or issues.
> 3. while we are doing the test, we can start going through the ASF
> release process locally, once we think it is ready to start a formal
> release note, it can be done very quickly.
>
> By the way, we need decide the release manager of 2.7.0 release. Is
> there anyone who volunteer to do that?
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:53 PM jun liu <ken.lj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, All
> >
> > I am writing this mail to
> >
> >  * Keep you refreshed of the latest status about v2.7.0.
> >  * Call for efforts on code review and tests
> >  * Discuss possible release schedules of v2.7.0.
> >
> > About v2.7, it’s going to be a milestone version, in which will make
> some significant changes. Most importantly, we will complete all IP
> Clearance related works. Technically speaking, it’s from this version on
> that a Dubbo release starts fully follows the Apache rules (lawfully),
> totally independent from any other third-party organizations or companies.
> Secondly, this version will include many new features that have received
> wide attention from the community, by supporting these features, we can
> better resolve the community’s long accumulated demands. Last but not
> least, we have made some architectural changes in this version, made Dubbo
> closer to the micro-service architecture, take the newly introduced
> configuration center as an example, it can work both as the center of
> Externalized Configuration at startup and as the center of service
> management configurations at runtime.
> >
> > To summarize, the contents already included in the CodeBase are:
> >
> > * Config Center: Zookeeper, Apollo, Nacos
> > * Externalized Configuration
> > * Service governance enhancement: dynamic configuration & routing rule
> > * Repackage to 'org.apache.dubbo'
> > * Java 8 support
> > * Async programming support
> >
> > Most of the candidates listed above are in the proposal list that we
> have discussed in some threads before. For a more detailed description of
> these features or how they are realized, you can refer to the draft
> development documentations within this link[1]
> >
> > Thanks to the efforts from the community (especially thank to Ian,
> CVictory and Minxuan), most of the development work has been completed and
> a round of code review and regression test based on some basic use cases
> have been completed[2].
> > Now I think it's time to prepare the formal release. One most important
> thing I think we should pay attention to is stability. We should guarantee
> it's stable enough before release, so we may need to put more effort into
> code review and functional testing. Based on my understanding of the
> CodeBase, such tests may at least continue to last for about 1 week, during
> this period we may need to `freeze the code`, which means only optimization
> and bugfix will be allowed. After that, we can continue to evaluate when to
> start the formal vote process.
> >
> > 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/2919
> > 2.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-samples/tree/samples-for-2.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards!
> Huxing
>

Reply via email to