On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:56 AM Huxing Zhang <hux...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:55 PM Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > (including Huxing) > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:55 PM Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Give substack a few days to reply and then nudge them on Twitter: > https://twitter.com/substack or their email (listed on > https://substack.net/ ). > > I tried to send them email and mention them on Twitter, but still got > no response. > Do you view it as a showstopper to an ASF release? > Can you confirm the following: * the test file would not be in the download for Apache Dubbo (and presumably other typical use cases)? * the test file would not be in Apache Dubbo source control (be that git or svn)? * the test file would not show up when an Apache Dubbo user uses Dubbo 'in production'? My instinct is to maintain the current dependency tree and open an issue with cliui and optionator that their dependency has an issue. They could inline the code, without the test file, or they could fork a new project with said code removed. Or they may be a better community position to effect change. What do folk think? Thanks, Hen
