+1 binding I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE OK - no unexpected binary files - source files have ASF headers - can compile from source
Kind regards, Mercy Ma On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:17 PM Yuhao Bi <biyu...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - signature and hash are fine > - LICENSE and NOTICE seems OK > - no unexpected binary files > - source files have ASF headers > - can compile from source code > > The following UT case[1] failed in my environment (OpenJDK 1.8.0_222 > CentOS7), > but I think it will not block this release. > > 1.test_getMethodNames_ContainExtendsParentMethods() > > Thanks, > Yuhao Bi > > Ian Luo <ian....@gmail.com> 于2020年3月9日周一 上午11:00写道： > > > I checked the following items. I vote +1 (binding) to this release. > > > > [v] Are release files in correct location? > > [v] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? > > [v] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? > > [v] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? > > [v] Is the NOTICE year correct? > > [x] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or > > NOTICE? > > [x] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? > > [x] Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so: > > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license? > > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? > > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE? > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so: > > [ ] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this > NOTICE > > file? > > [ ] Do all source files have ASF headers? > > [v] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version > > control? > > [x] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? > > [v] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear? > > > > I vote with: > > [v] +1 release the software > > [ ] +0 not sure if it should be released > > [ ] -1 don’t release the software because.. > > > > Regards, > > -Ian. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:10 PM Jun Liu <liu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hello Dubbo Community, > > > > > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Dubbo version 2.6.8. > > > > > > The release candidates: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/dubbo/dubbo/2.6.8/ > > > > > > Git tag for the release: > > > https://github.com/apache/dubbo/tree/dubbo-2.6.8 > > > > > > Hash for the release tag: > > > 5a6a069986f3627f2d50720c50024df31a3dc38a > > > > > > Release Notes: > > > Backport some changes from 2.7 to 2.6 > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key: 28681CB1, which can be > > > found in the keys file: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/dubbo/KEYS > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number > of > > > votes are reached. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Thanks, > > > The Apache Dubbo Team > > > > > > -- *Mercy Ma* GMail:mercybl...@gmail.com Yahoo: mercy.bl...@yahoo.com Wetchat: mercyblitz-1985 Twitter : @mercyblitz <http://twitter.com/mercyblitz> Blog : https://mercyblitz.github.io/
