Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-128

And PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pull/64 for the fix

Please help review


On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Michael Wu <mchl....@gmail.com> wrote:

> cool, thanks Edward and Ralph!
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Zhang, Edward (GDI Hadoop) <
> yonzh...@ebay.com> wrote:
>
> > This is related to EAGLE-79, I think Ralph has said he will fix that.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Edward
> >
> > On 1/13/16, 0:29, "Michael Wu" <mchl....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi team,
> > >
> > >We're almost there, only 1 test case failed in the latest build:
> > >https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/12/testReport/,
> please
> > >try to tackle it!
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >Michael
> > >
> > >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Michael Wu <mchl....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Okay, thanks.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Zhang, Edward (GDI Hadoop) <
> > >> yonzh...@ebay.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I have fixed
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >>>org.apache.eagle.alert.state.TestSiddhiStateSnapshotAndRestore.persisten
> > >>>ceT
> > >>> est7, will create pull request.
> > >>>
> > >>> For https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pull/43, can you look
> at
> > >>> why
> > >>> it is not passing the checks. We need merge that pull request 43
> soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>> edward
> > >>>
> > >>> On 1/11/16, 19:05, "Michael Wu" <mchl....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> >Hi all,
> > >>> >
> > >>> >I've setup a CI job for building and running unit test against
> ealge's
> > >>> >master branch, the job is at:
> > >>> >https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/, with unit test
> > >>> >failing
> > >>> >all the time. I think it's the time for us to reach out and fix the
> > >>>unit
> > >>> >tests.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >Each time the job fails, it's configured to send out an email to all
> > >>>of
> > >>> us
> > >>> >with subject starting with "[EAGLE BUILD FAILED]", please take a
> look
> > >>> when
> > >>> >you receive such emails to make sure if there is any failing case of
> > >>>your
> > >>> >own, or you can define a rule/label to classify them.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >For every CI build, there is a testing result page of it, on which
> we
> > >>>can
> > >>> >see overall status of the build.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >To get to the test result page, we can either click into a specific
> > >>>build
> > >>> >then click "Test Result" in the left-nav, or use below url template
> > >>>with
> > >>> >replacing build-number and then open it in browsers:
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/${build-number}/testR
> > >>>ep
> > >>> >ort/
> > >>> >.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >E.g. the 7th build of the job, holds test result at
> > >>> >https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/7/testReport/
> > >>> >
> > >>> >Currently, I summed the failing test case as below, please anyone
> who
> > >>>is
> > >>> >the owner try to fix them:
> > >>> >org.apache.eagle.alert.cep.TestSiddhiEvaluator.test
> > >>> ><
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/7/testReport/org.apac
> > >>>h
> > >>> >e.eagle.alert.cep/TestSiddhiEvaluator/test/>
> > >>> >org.apache.eagle.alert.dao.TestSiddhiStreamMetadataUtils.test
> > >>> ><
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/7/testReport/org.apac
> > >>>h
> > >>> >e.eagle.alert.dao/TestSiddhiStreamMetadataUtils/test/>
> > >>> >org.apache.eagle.alert.dao.TestStreamDefinitionDAOImpl.test
> > >>> ><
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/7/testReport/org.apac
> > >>>h
> > >>> >e.eagle.alert.dao/TestStreamDefinitionDAOImpl/test/>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >>>>org.apache.eagle.alert.state.TestSiddhiStateSnapshotAndRestore.persiste
> > >>>>nce
> > >>> >Test7
> > >>> ><
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-eagle-main/7/testReport/org.apac
> > >>>h
> > >>>
> >
> >>>>e.eagle.alert.state/TestSiddhiStateSnapshotAndRestore/persistenceTest7/
> > >>>>>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >Thanks.
> > >>> >Michael
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to