Mike, I found a sample cancel vote thread. I think a simple cancel with reason stated should be ok, detailed result could be better. You might follow the same.
@Julian, comment? //// reference ( don't know how to make email as attached directly, simply copy here for refernece.) [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1 Christopher Collins <[email protected]> May 28 Hello all, Voting for the release of 0.9.0-incubating-rc1 has been cancelled due to some incorrectly packaged source [*]. Sorry for the confusion, and thank you to everyone who voted. A second release candidate will be put up for a vote on the dev list shortly. Thanks, Chris [*] For the newt release, a subdirectory was packaged rather than the entire repo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Julian, > > I'd say, it's the quality of the release that is more important than > anything else. As you mentioned, I'll bring another discussion for this > issue. BTW, could you let me know if I have to send a result email of the 2 > rejected RC to cancel the VOTE? Thanks. > > Michael > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I feel your pain: it's painful to have two RCs shot down. But let's > > not have design discussions on a VOTE thread. Let's cancel the vote, > > and start a discussion in another thread. If there is an existing JIRA > > for this issue, please forward that; it will help us avoid going over > > the same old ground. > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @ Hemanth, > > > > > > Indeed, we could have kept the tar containing only source code, without > > > packaged non-open-source stuffs, I know it's required by Apache policy, > > and > > > agree with the policy totally. > > > > > > However, for our project, let's just make an imagination, if we move > the > > > jars out of the project and create the source tar, so far for voting > and > > > consequently for releasing in the future, each time customers of the > > > project download the source code, they may be unable to build the > project > > > with merely executing maven build commands, on the contrary, they have > to > > > download and place these depended jars appropriately by themselves, > isn't > > > it unfriendly and a super boring manner? > > > > > > Then, that's why I asked you guys who may know the use of the jars and > > may > > > give valuable suggestions for how to deal better with them, on 1 hand > not > > > blocking future maven builds, on the other hand can make it satisfy > > > apache's release policy. Currently, I'm still not sure if it may bring > > many > > > additional efforts, but customer friendly seems very important to a > > project. > > > > > > So, could you give some details on how much the removal of jars will > > affect > > > the build? Appreciated! > > > > > > @ all, do you guys have any thought on this issue, please? We seem to > > have > > > been blocked a bit at it. Thanks. > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Dendukuri, Hemanth < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Michael, Since this is voting for source only, we need to make sure > only > > >> eagle source if voted. > > >> > > >> The artifacts should be uploaded for voting before packaging ("mvn > > >> package”), I believe. > > >> > > >> You can provide the instructions on how to get required tomcat jars > for > > >> the build, if eagle has dependencies. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> Hemanth > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 7/7/16, 11:30 PM, "Michael Wu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> >@ Hemanth, > > >> > > > >> >Did you mean to directly remove the > eagle-assembly/src/main/lib/tomcat > > >> >directory before packaging the source? I saw the directory removed in > > >> >0.3.0-incubating release, do you have any idea about the following 2: > > >> >1. does this removal impact building approach and behavior? > > >> >2. if we remove it, after "mvn package" phase, will the final jar > > >> assembled > > >> >have potential running issue with eagle-service? > > >> > > > >> >If the jars have dependencies on them, we may have to make more > > efforts to > > >> >fix it before voting RC3. > > >> > > > >> >Thanks. > > >> >Michael > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Zhou < > [email protected] > > > > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> +1 > > >> >> * Built and tested successfully in centos 7 with jdk1.7 > > >> >> > > >> >> Regards, > > >> >> Da > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:33 PM, Jinhu Wu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > +1 > > >> >> > * Get the tar package and built successfully on MAC OS X with JDK > > >> >> 1.7(java > > >> >> > version "1.7.0_80") > > >> >> > * checked md5, sha1 successfully > > >> >> > * rat checked and is ok > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Jilin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> +1 > > >> >> >> * Downloaded & built successfully on windows7 64-bit JDK 1.7 > > >> >> >> * md5, sha1 check passed > > >> >> >> * tag matches > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Thanks for your help > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> 2016-07-08 10:15 GMT+08:00 Zhao Qingwen <[email protected]>: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >>> +1 (binding) > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> Best Regards, > > >> >> >>> Qingwen Zhao | 赵晴雯 > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>> 2016-07-08 8:37 GMT+08:00 Edward Zhang < > [email protected] > > >: > > >> >> >>> > > >> >> >>>> Sorry, correct my vote from "non-binding" to "binding" :-) > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> Thanks > > >> >> >>>> Edward > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Edward Zhang < > > >> [email protected] > > >> >> > > > >> >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>>> +1 (not-binding) > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> * Downloaded & built successfully with Hotspot JDK1.7 on OSX > > >> >> >>>>> * Signature checked, md5, sha1 verified ( > > >> >> >>>>> https://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html) > > >> >> >>>>> * Apache rat:check passed (mvn apache-rat:check) > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> * Commit and tag matched > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> Thanks > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> Edward > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Michael Wu < > > [email protected]> > > >> >> >>> wrote: > > >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Hi all, > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> This is a release vote for Apache Eagle, version > > >> 0.4.0-incubating, > > >> >> >>>> release > > >> >> >>>>>> candidate 2. > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Highlighted changes in this release are as the following: > > >> >> >>>>>> * JBDC Metadata Storage Extension > > >> >> >>>>>> * Topology management in remote mode including > > start/stop/status > > >> >> >>>>>> operations > > >> >> >>>>>> * Auditlogparser for MapR's audit log > > >> >> >>>>>> * Oozie auditlog integration for Oozie security monitoring > > >> >> >>>>>> * Add applicaiton "maprFSAuditLog" > > >> >> >>>>>> * Refactor bin/eagle-sandbox-starter.sh to make it easier > to > > use > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Here's the release note: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-eagle.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.txt;hb=refs/heads/branch-0.4 > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located at: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/eagle/0.4.0-incubating-rc2/ > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> The commit to be voted upon: > > >> >> >>>>>> * > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/commit/23d3ca604a37ccb89d7a95e5c75cfba651673b2a > > >> >> >>>>>> < > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/commit/23d3ca604a37ccb89d7a95e5c75cfba651673b2a > > >> >> >>>>>>> * > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Release tag is: > > >> >> >>>>>> * > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/releases/tag/v0.4.0-incubating-rc2 > > >> >> >>>>>> < > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/releases/tag/v0.4.0-incubating-rc2 > > >> >> >>>>>>> * > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > >> >> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mw.asc > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows: > > >> >> >>>>>> apache-eagle-0.4.0-incubating-src-rc2.tar.gz.md5: > > >> >> >>>>>> 0a78ed6c36ba57194f6721a8d6bae6f4 > > >> >> >>>>>> apache-eagle-0.4.0-incubating-src-rc2.tar.gz.sha1: > > >> >> >>>>>> f59b3d7d894181eb2019bb55f4cf6079a47339eb > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as: Apache Eagle > > >> >> >>> 0.4.0-incubating. > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a > > majority > > >> of > > >> >> >> at > > >> >> >>>>>> least > > >> >> >>>>>> three +1 PPMC votes are cast. > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating Release > > >> Candidate > > >> >> >> 2. > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the > > >> release > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks. > > >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> >>>>>> Michael > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >
