Dale LaBossiere created EDGENT-271:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: binary-release conform better to license&notice for 3rd 
party content
                 Key: EDGENT-271
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EDGENT-271
             Project: Edgent
          Issue Type: Task
            Reporter: Dale LaBossiere


In response to review of binary release LICENSE/NOTICE and the reference and 
content of binary-release-bundled-content:

The info looks good, but it’s not really in line with what is recommend to do 
[1] If it put up for an incubator vote, it IMO is likely to pass (given 
everything else is good) but is likely to get a few “please fix in next 
release” comments.

My minor concerns are:
- LICENSE doesn’t include the text of 3rd party licenses but points to another 
file.
- Some license are referred to by URL, information at that URL can change over 
time. It’s best to download and include a copy of that license.
- pointing to content inside a jar required the user to unpack that jar to se 
ether information. IMO better to copy all license files into a seperate 
directory where they can be clearly seen.
- May not be complying with some 3rd party license terms. While the licenses 
are permissive most licenses state you need to include the full text of the 
license in anything you distribute.
- NOTICE refers to the same external file as LICENSE. NOTICE and LICENSE are 
for different purposes and in general NOTICE doesn't include licensing 
information.
- NOTICE may be missing [2] information from bundled ASLv2 software NOTICE 
files. [2]

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice

-----------------------------------------------
A separate jira has been created for the pi4J issue:

- javax.servlet-api-3.1.0.jar is CDDL-2 and GPL.  
See [4] and https://glassfish.java.net/nonav/public/CDDL+GPL.html 
<https://glassfish.java.net/nonav/public/CDDL+GPL.html>

- javax.websocket-api-1.0.jar is CDDL-1.1 and GPL-2
See [5] and https://glassfish.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL_1_1.html 
<https://glassfish.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL_1_1.html>


The above is fine as you can select the license to use from any dual licensed 
software and CDDL is category B and is allowed to be used in a convenience 
binary.

- pi4j-core-1.0.jar is LGPL-3.0
See [6] and http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.txt 
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.txt>

This would not be allowed. You could ask VP legal togged permission to make a 
release if you going to be removed in the next incubating release.

Thanks,
Justin



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to