It's not a big problem but since we have to build with jdk6 we are more
likely going to introduce jdk6 api in empire-db core without noticing.

I'll switch the remaining jenkins builds to jdk6

Sent with my smartphone.
On Apr 15, 2012 11:27 PM, "Rainer Döbele" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was wondering why I got this compilation error from Jenkins.
> From the message I could not figure out, where the problem is.
>
> Yes in fact (and unfortunately) there is currently one call that makes
> Java 1.6 necessary (ResourceBundle.containsKey()). I might be able to find
> a workaround for this, but then why should we?
> For his particular module I think we can raise the requirement to Java 1.6
> since it's old and mature enough now.
> Or do you think this is a problem?
>
> Since Jenknis now reports it is back to normal I assume, that you switched
> to Java 6 for the build.
> Correct?
>
> Rainer
>
>
> > from: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
> Francis De Brabandere
> > to: dev
> > re: Fwd: Jenkins build is back to normal : Empire-db snapshot #421
> >
> > Rainer,
> >
> > I see the JSF module is not JDK-5 compatible, making JDK6 mandatory to
> > build empire-db.
> >
> >         <properties>
> >               <maven.compile.source>1.6</maven.compile.source>
> >               <maven.compile.target>1.6</maven.compile.target>
> >       </properties>
> >
> > Do we really need this 1.6 target & source? We should at least
> > communicate this to our users on the next release.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > F
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Apache Jenkins Server <[email protected]>
> > Date: 15 April 2012 17:47
> > Subject: Jenkins build is back to normal : Empire-db snapshot #421
> > To: [email protected], [email protected]
> >
> >
> > See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Empire-db%20snapshot/421/>
>

Reply via email to