> On Feb. 1, 2016, 10:08 p.m., Balu Vellanki wrote: > > Is there any specific reason why we are reducing Hadoop version number for > > regression? > > Venkatesan Ramachandran wrote: > Balu, are you asking why 2.6.2 instead of 2.7.x? The community felt that > 2.6.2 is widely used and sticking to 2.6.2 will help adoption and migration.
I checked the timeline on jira and now I understand why it was done. Thank you - Balu ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42925/#review117284 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 31, 2016, 1:22 a.m., Venkatesan Ramachandran wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/42925/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 31, 2016, 1:22 a.m.) > > > Review request for Falcon. > > > Repository: falcon-git > > > Description > ------- > > Upgrade hadoop.version to 2.6.2 or above > > > Diffs > ----- > > addons/designer/pom.xml 28a977a > common/pom.xml 8605358 > falcon-regression/pom.xml 6bf3d50 > pom.xml 4a6bd35 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42925/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Unit and integration tests. > > > Thanks, > > Venkatesan Ramachandran > >
