Ok. if that being the case, is it possible to refer daily and hourly dynamically in the workflow definition? The use case: A job is reading 30 days of data and the daily data is available for all except the last day -- for which only hourly is available. In this case, either the job waits for the last day daily data to become available or consume all the 24 hours and let the job run.
Thanks Venkat On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:55 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan <[email protected]> wrote: Currently hourly and daily are independent feeds. It might make sense to model hourly as a partition of daily but that would require reasonable work. Sent from my iPhone On 26-May-2014, at 12:33 am, Venkat R <[email protected]> wrote: Hi All, > > >is there a way to logically associate the hourly and daily versions of the >feeds? >Or do they have to be two different feeds in falcon feed definition? > > >Wondering is it possible to create a flow definition so that it consumes daily >version of the feed instances by default, but hourly versions for those >instances missing daily? > > >Thanks >Venkat
