[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14128757#comment-14128757
]
Venkatesh Seetharam commented on FALCON-665:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Can't we depend on activemq?
Nope. This is not possible since there are folks using other MQ brokers and
breaks compatibility.
bq. Actually, this is an issue. If all the listeners swallow the exception,
JMSMessageConsumer.onMessage() will acknowledge which is wrong?
Pls look at the code again, ack is done right after consumption and if there
was an exception, it would not come to ack but goes to catch clause
> Handle message consumption failures in JMSMessageConsumer
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FALCON-665
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-665
> Project: Falcon
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: messaging
> Affects Versions: 0.6
> Reporter: Venkatesh Seetharam
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.6
>
> Attachments: FALCON-665-review.patch, FALCON-665-v1.patch
>
>
> Not sure which Queue ([~shwethags], [~shaik.idris])?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
