Why not? :-) Is there a way to generate 1.7 compatible jar from 1.8? On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Shwetha GS <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, 1.7 please > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > What about JDK? Should we move to 1.8 directly? > > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Shwetha GS <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan < > > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1. > > > > > > > > Hadoop 2, Oozie 4.0 & above and JDK 1.7 (with no restriction, should > be > > > > possible to use JDK 1.8) for 0.6 & above. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Srikanth Sundarrajan > > > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:27 -0700 > > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Withdraw support for Hadoop-1 and Oozie 3.x with > > 0.6 > > > > release > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > Hey folks, > > > > > > > > > > I'm planning on proposing removing support for hadoop-1 and > oozie-3.x > > > for > > > > > the upcoming 0.6 release. Since most of the users that I know are > > > already > > > > > on Hadoop-2.x and Oozie 4.x, it does not make sense for us as a > > > community > > > > > to support these and spend time testing these. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Venkatesh > > > > > > > > > > “Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more > to > > > > add, > > > > > but rather when there is nothing more to take away.” > > > > > - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > _____________________________________________________________ > > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for > > the > > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally > > privileged > > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby > > notified > > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in > > reliance > > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please > notify > > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your > > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete > > transmission > > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in > > its > > > receipt. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Venkatesh > > > > “Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to > add, > > but rather when there is nothing more to take away.” > > - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________ > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its > receipt. > -- Regards, Venkatesh “Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away.” - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
