[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14166560#comment-14166560
 ] 

Peeyush Bishnoi commented on FALCON-510:
----------------------------------------

[~sriksun] Initially I have thought on the similar way as you have mentioned. 
But while using global section with sub-workflow action in workflow.xml, it is 
not working as expected. I have created a bug for this OOZIE-2030 . Once this 
Oozie issue get fix, we will be able to inject falcon properties to Hadoop job 
conf.

> Inject falcon related properties to job conf
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-510
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Shwetha G S
>            Assignee: Peeyush Bishnoi
>         Attachments: falcon-510.txt
>
>
> Currently there is no falcon context injected at MR job level. The job conf 
> has at most the oozie workflow / action ID either in the job name or 
> sometimes in the job conf.
> Therefore there is no way for a tool like hraven, which relies completely on 
> jobconf and job history data, to identify that a particular job maps to a 
> particular falcon process or it's instance time, etc. Right now hraven does 
> regex-based job name surgery on a best effort basis before emitting metrics 
> to graphite
> Request the following feature in falcon:
> Add the following properties to the job conf (for all jobs - be it a pig 
> action or an MR action):
> falcon.process.name
> falcon.process.instancetime
> while we're at it, might as well add any other falcon context as a jobconf 
> property (like whether it was a rerun or the input/output feeds, cluster, 
> validity, any process properties, etc.)
> This will ofcourse inject at the first job level and cannot ensure that any 
> child jobs get the properties passed on (unless we can figure out a way to do 
> that too).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to