+1 for the test reorganization. I am also in favor of TestNG grouping. We can keep these as separate tasks.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Samarth Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for this. > > it will also be beneficial if we are able to add similar testNG groups at > test level also. That will give more control to the person running > regression and interested in testing on particular feature or exclude some > particular group. > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Paul Isaychuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > Our team discussed an idea of tests reorganization. > > The idea is to split up and sort all of tests between packages below: > > > > - remotefs (azure, s3 tests) > > - hcat > > - security (acl, authorization etc.) > > - ui > > - entity (all entity-oriented tests) > > - instance (all instance-oriented tests) > > - features (all tests which relate to things like replication, > > retention, retry etc.) > > - lineage > > - prism (we can left distributed mode specific tests here) > > > > Any comments on that? > > > > -- > > > > Paul Isaychuk > > > > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > >
