[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227597#comment-14227597
]
Suhas Vasu edited comment on FALCON-910 at 11/27/14 12:49 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I feel, we should ensure that staging and working directories are different for
now as it breaks the functionality.
The locations for cluster are not enums and causes confusion for new users to
specify these locations when submitting the cluster. I feel we should revisit
how we define locations for cluster and take it in a separate jira.
was (Author: suhas.ysr):
I feel, we should ensure that staging and working directories are different for
now.
We have always wanted to move to xml configs and I feel we should move to just
one directory when we take up the changes in configs.
> Better error messages when creating cluster's directories
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FALCON-910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-910
> Project: Falcon
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: client
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Adam Kawa
> Assignee: karan kumar
> Priority: Minor
>
> I followed the example from
> http://hortonworks.com/blog/introduction-apache-falcon-hadoop, where all
> locations (i.e. staging, working, temp) of the cluster are set to the same
> directory.
> {code}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <cluster colo="toronto" description="Primary Cluster"
> (...)
> <locations>
> <location name="staging" path="/tmp/falcon"/>
> <location name="working" path="/tmp/falcon"/>
> <location name="temp" path="/tmp/falcon"/>
> </locations>
> </cluster>
> {code}
> When submitting such a cluster entity, I got:
> {code}
> bash-4.1$ ./bin/falcon entity -submit -type cluster -file cluster.xml
> Stacktrace:
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconCLIException: Bad Request;Path /tmp/falcon has
> permissions: rwxr-xr-x, should be rwxrwxrwx
> at
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconCLIException.fromReponse(FalconCLIException.java:44)
> at
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconClient.checkIfSuccessful(FalconClient.java:1162)
> at
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconClient.sendEntityRequestWithObject(FalconClient.java:684)
> at org.apache.falcon.client.FalconClient.submit(FalconClient.java:323)
> at org.apache.falcon.cli.FalconCLI.entityCommand(FalconCLI.java:361)
> at org.apache.falcon.cli.FalconCLI.run(FalconCLI.java:182)
> at org.apache.falcon.cli.FalconCLI.main(FalconCLI.java:132)
> bash-4.1$ ./bin/falcon entity -submit -type cluster -file cluster.xml
> Stacktrace:
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconCLIException: Bad Request;Path /tmp/falcon has
> permissions: rwxrwxrwx, should be rwxr-xr-x
> at
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconCLIException.fromReponse(FalconCLIException.java:44)
> at
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconClient.checkIfSuccessful(FalconClient.java:1162)
> at
> org.apache.falcon.client.FalconClient.sendEntityRequestWithObject(FalconClient.java:684)
> at org.apache.falcon.client.FalconClient.submit(FalconClient.java:323)
> at org.apache.falcon.cli.FalconCLI.entityCommand(FalconCLI.java:361)
> at org.apache.falcon.cli.FalconCLI.run(FalconCLI.java:182)
> at org.apache.falcon.cli.FalconCLI.main(FalconCLI.java:132)
> {code}
> I can change these permission forever with the same effect :)
> According to
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-falcon/blob/master/common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/parser/ClusterEntityParser.java
> {code}
> for (Location location : cluster.getLocations().getLocations()) {
> final String locationName = location.getName();
> if (locationName.equals("temp")) {
> continue;
> }
> try {
> checkPathOwnerAndPermission(cluster.getName(),
> location.getPath(), fs,
> "staging".equals(locationName)
> ? HadoopClientFactory.ALL_PERMISSION
> :
> HadoopClientFactory.READ_EXECUTE_PERMISSION);
> } catch (IOException e) {
> (...)
> }
> }
> {code}
> This basically means:
> * staging directory must have exactly ALL permissions
> * execute directory must have exactly READ_EXECUTE permissions
> If the staging and execute directories are the same, then we have the
> misconfiguration that is hard to detect based on the current message.
> Therefore:
> * a better (less confusing) message could be printed
> * or, code could be fixed that execute directory should have at least (not
> exactly) READ_EXECUTE permissions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
