Richard S. Hall wrote: > Well, the plan is to be R4 compliant...probably R4.1 now...but the path to hell is paved with good intentions... ;-)
;)) But perhaps if a lab can be set up (so the community can get involved) it could ease the pain and hasten the process. >> BTW, that generic capability/requirement >> model... was it implemented in require-bundle or OBR? It sounds similar >> to what I've implemented at work to customize OBR in order to >> "recognize" locally installed bundles. >> > It was implemented in require-bundle using the concepts defined for OBR2... Yes, and it works very neatly too. I was thinking of the same thing for JSR-124 which could be in the same lab if one is set up. Regards. Rick Litton -----Original Message----- From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Support for Fragment Bundles Rick Litton wrote: > Glad to know that there IS such a plan. I would like to assist just in > case you need any help. Well, the plan is to be R4 compliant...probably R4.1 now...but the path to hell is paved with good intentions... ;-) > BTW, that generic capability/requirement > model... was it implemented in require-bundle or OBR? It sounds similar > to what I've implemented at work to customize OBR in order to > "recognize" locally installed bundles. > It was implemented in require-bundle using the concepts defined for OBR2... -> richard > Rick Litton > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Support for Fragment Bundles > > Rick Litton wrote: > >> Is there any plan to support fragment bundles (3.14 of R4) soon in >> Felix? I noticed that an issue has been opened -- FELIX-29 -- but no >> work seems to have been done on it yet. Is there any reason or >> > concern > >> why it is being postponed? Thanks. >> > > There is a plan, just need to find the time... > > The work on adding support for require-bundle was essentially a > preliminary step for fragments too, since we added a generic > capability/requirement model, which will hopefully be useful for > fragment dependencies too. > > I doubt this will happen "soon" since it is probably the most > complicated feature of all those yet implemented, but it will happen. > First, we have to get another release out and finish off a few other > things yet. Stay tuned. > > -> richard >
