As in a conversation I had with Peter Kriens he was pointing out that he could not think of a useful use case where the raw service listener can be used due to the missing of the events raised before. And what's the then the listener? The ServiceTracker.
In my view it's qualifying for being part of the framework because it reduces the complexity of service tracking and is less error prone then using the service listener for the unaware. Regards, Alin Dreghiciu On 5/22/07, Richard S. Hall < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should Felix start including ServiceTracker in the framework JAR file? Up until now, it has never been included because the framework doesn't use it, so it is just extra cruft and can easily be downloaded separately. However, it appears that other frameworks make it available by default. Thoughts? -> richard
