I had the same doubt this days and it also started from the servlet api. As right now by posting a new pom for another version to be wrapped indeed we will get that version in the commons repo and also the old version remains becuase the repo is not purged but the problem will be that we cannot rebuild the older version if I mistake it's to be found. My idea is to keep the pom's as right now but to modify the structure of the project to something like for example: felix --commons ----servlet-api ------2.3 --------pom.xml (will generate org.apache.felix.commons.servlet-api-2.3.0-0001-SNAPSHOT.jar) ------2.4 --------pom.xml (will generate org.apache.felix.commons.servlet-api-2.4.0-0001-SNAPSHOT.jar)
Alin On 5/25/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the commons svn tree is supposed to be a repository of OSGI bundles, wouldn't it be better to put the version of the embedded library in the folder name. For example, I'd like to work on an HTTP service based on Jetty 6 / servlet 2.5, but there is already a servlet bundle for 2.3. So, what about using servlet-api-2.3 instead of servlet-api and same for others maybe (or maybe not). I don't think there is a need to change the artifactId. Another related question: when one should include the related libraries in the bundle or reference another bundle ? I see that the http.jetty service includes jetty instead of importing the package ... -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
