>On Saturday 14 July 2007 08:51, Karl Pauls wrote: > >> http://people.apache.org/~rickhall/felix-1.0.0.html >> >> We ask that you please vote to approve these release archives: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.0 sub-project releases. > >[x] -1 > >First thing; One can't VETO a release, only codebase changes. So the above is > >a vote against release, to be counted normally. However, most projects tries >to resolve any disagreements to reach consensus and not force through >decisions, although sometimes necessary. Nevertheless...
Ok. However, we created release candidates hoping to get feedback early rather than late... >Second thing; The reason for the negative vote is a somewhat non-compliant >release format. > > * LICENSE and NOTICE must be in root directory of the tarballs of the >source. > Apache is about Open SOURCE, and there are no requirements to distribute > a pre-built binary. However, if that is done, the same files should go >into > the root of that binary tarball. The situation for Maven produced >artifacts > are still a little bit unclear, but I think we will end up with the same > requirement there. We did this for the incubator release and were told we had them in the wrong place then, thus we moved them to their current location. -> richard > * The org.osgi.core says in NOTICE that it includes files from the OSGi > Alliance, but there is no license included nor referenced. > > * Peter Kriens "All rights reserved." copyright requires a license, which > is not referenced. > > >Otherwise, EXCELLENT to see the progress! > > >Cheers >-- >Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > >I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er >I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc >I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
