Richard S. Hall wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just looked into javax.servlet module in order to have a first 1.0.0 >> release. I fixed the dependencies to released versions and compared the >> result. They are identical, so we *could* release javax.servlet. >> >> The only missing things are the notice and licence files. Any suggestion >> on these onese? >> > > This was one of the issues, although I am not sure why it is an issue, > but it was raised by someone a long time ago in incubation. > > BJ Hargrave donated this code, which he said was just a hacked version > of some Tomcat code downgraded to servlet 2.1. Ah, ok.
> So, from my point of view > we shouldn't have any issues here, but someone thought there was...I > can't remember off hand. > Yes, I have the same problem :) > At any rate, I think it should just be Apache licensed and Apache > copyrighted in the notice file. Yes, I think this should be enough. I'll add the files and assemble the release next week unless "the person who thought that there are issues" speaks up of course. Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
