Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
+1
We used *.sha file names, the maven gpg plugin automatically generates
*.sha1 files; that's why I used them for the releases I did.
It would be nice to use the same extension, and I don't have any
preference. The sha1 is a little bit simpler if you're using maven to
generate the release.
Ok, then in the future I think we should go with *.sha1 too, just to be
consistent and simple.
-> richard
Carsten
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 09/01/2008, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
One small thing, previously we had been using *.sha1 file names, while
this uses *.sha file names. Should we be consistent here in the future?
don't mind either way... I was just following the historical convention
on http://apache.org/dist/felix, where framework and main use .sha
-> richard
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to start a vote for the first release of the
maven-obr-plugin.
I've built and signed the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/maven-obr-plugin
You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this
directory.
Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for
72hrs)
Cheers, Stuart
