> +1 But I thought seriously to send -1 because the LICENSE file contained > in all the releases is only a LICENSE template, in fact it contains the > sentence:"Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]", instead of > reporting our license information. Does anyone know of how to fill the > license file?
Well, this is not needed as far as I know. The goal of the ASL 2.0 is explicitly to allow the inclusion without modification of the LICENSE file. The [yyy] template is only in the appendix to show how to apply the License to your work. In other words it is _not_ a template but the real deal. Have a look at: http://www.apache.org/licenses/ and http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new regards, Karl > Ciao, > Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi > > > Karl Pauls wrote: > > I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.0.3 > > as well as on the bundlerepository 1.0.2 release. > > > > The source release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5 > > message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~pauls/felix-1.0.3.html > > > > Additionally, a binary release is included on the page as a > > convenience download as well as the framework, main, and > > bundlerepository binaries and poms in > > order to make them available via maven. > > > > Please vote to approve these release archives: > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the Felix 1.0.3 framework and main releases > > as well as the bundlerepository 1.0.2 release. > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > > > -- Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
