On 05/02/2008, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks good to me. > > Up until now we have been including in the notice file our top-level > dependencies. Is there some distinction we want to draw between "used" > software that is actually embedded in the release versus "used" software > that we depend on?
I thought that was covered by the 'Included Software' vs. 'Used Software' sections. (ie. embedded software from outside the project comes under 'Included Software' ?) -> richard > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what do you think if we start setting up our notice file like this: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/scrplugin/NOTICE > > > > (I just committed it to have a better base for discussion as quoting > > the whole thing in an email is not very comfortable for discussing.) > > > > I splitted the notice file into three sections, one listening the > > included software (and licenses), one section for the used software > > (and licenses) and the third one for a summary of all licenses. > > > > > > WDYT? > > Carsten > -- Cheers, Stuart
