On 26/02/2008, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 Looks good to me. There is this build.xml that doesn't have a > license header and i'm not sure whether it needs one but that is not a > big issue.
yep - I decided not to add a license header to the build.xml file because a) I consider it trivial and b) it will be part of the user's generated project, and I didn't want to push a license onto them. the Ant scripts generated by the ant plugin also have no license, it's just that here we use a template file to produce it, rather than Java code (but I consider both 'generated' content). HTH regards, > > > Karl > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I'd like to start a vote for the 1.4.0 release of the > maven-bundle-plugin, > > which now has complete integration of the OBR goals with the bundle > > life-cycle (plus a couple of improvements made possible by this work) > > along with support for attaching bundles with different "classifiers". > > > > I've built and signed the release candidate and made it available here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/maven-bundle-plugin > > > > You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this > directory. > > Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for > 72hrs) > > > > -- > > Cheers, Stuart > > > > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Cheers, Stuart
