Of course there are alternatives, but that is not really at issue here.
We want alternatives, so the question to answer is: Is a full-featured
telnet bundle a good alternative?
I say, yes.
-> richard
Didier Donsez wrote:
Hi all
An alternative to telnet shell or ssh shell could be JMX over
"everything".
I have commit a Shell mbean in my sandbox
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/donsez/mosgi.util/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/donsez/mbean.shell/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/sandbox/donsez/mbean.shell.felix/
I have also one mbean for the KF shell and one for the Equinox shell.
I'm currently refactoring the client side to remove the dependencies
with the JConsole (GPLv2 Classpath Exception).
Here is a snapshot of the current JConsole client (in the VisualVM).
http://www-adele.imag.fr/users/Didier.Donsez/dev/osgi/jconsole.osgi/jconsole.shell.png
Best regards
Didier
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Dieter,
Dieter Wimberger schrieb:
If it is for a simple access to the Felix Shell Service that uses:
shs.executeCommand(String line,PrintStream out,PrintStream out);
then I don't see much sense to move this to Apache Felix, because
the simple remote shell does the job effectively and is much more
efficient. I think even if SSH is the argument we may simply try to
make a "SSH version" (using jaramiko).
I agree completely.
So let's collect good reasons, because these would also be the
foundation to argue an inclusion with/in the Felix PMC.
Agreed. My personal opinion is, that it would be cool for Felix to be
able to provide such telnet. Is this enough ?
Regards
Felix
PS: You CLA has been registered. Thanks.
