Pierre De Rop wrote:
oups, I missed that point ! you are right: multi-components can be
specified in two ways:
1/
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<components xmlns:scr="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/scr/v1.0.0";>
<scr:component enabled="true" name="Component1">
<scr:implementation class="test.ds.hello.HelloComponent"/>
<scr:reference name="logService"
interface="org.osgi.service.log.LogService" ...
</scr:component>
<scr:component enabled="true" name="Component2">
<scr:implementation class="test.ds.hello.HelloComponent"/>
<scr:reference name="logService"
interface="org.osgi.service.log.LogService" ...
</scr:component>
</components>
as well as:
2/
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<component name="Component1">
<implementation class="test.ds.hello.HelloComponent"/>
<reference name="LOG" interface="org.osgi.service.log.LogService" ...
</component>
<component name=""Component2">
<implementation class="test.ds.hello.HelloComponent"/>
<reference name="LOG" interface="org.osgi.service.log.LogService" ...
</component>
I did not know the case 1/ and always used the case 2/
No problem :) I'm actually not sure if case 2 is really allowed. Our scr
implementation is able to read this xml, but it's not a valid xml
document, so I guess it's safer to use case 1. Please note that actually
the name of the root element can be anything. So even
<foo xmlns:scr=".."/>
<scr:component...>
</foo>
should work.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
