Karl Pauls wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But why is not 1.1? Because it follows the odd number for development
/ even number for release?
Yes. Thats what we agreed on a while ago.
In an <major>.<minor>.<revision>, the odd/even rule apply only on minor?
That was the idea, yes.
That is how we have been doing it, but it was somewhat of an arbitrary
choice.
However, the odd/even thing does help us with the version number issue
to make sure that our released version is greater than our development
version (i.e., 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT is less than 1.2.0, while 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
is greater than 1.2.0, which is not what we would want).
-> richard
regards,
Karl
--
Alin Dreghiciu
http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
working on Great Projects at Great Places
