On 3/27/09 1:33 PM, clement escoffier wrote:
2009/3/27 Marcel Offermans<[email protected]>
Our users are telling us they want a full R4.1 implementation (this is one
of the things I've been hearing for a long time now), so I think we should
make an effort to get to that point.
Exactly, I forget to mention that. They definitely want the compliance and
additional services. However, I know that Rick is working hard to get the
fragments. Is it the last missing core functionality?
For R4.1, the main features are fragments and lazy activation (there is
security, too, but less important). Once we get the 1.6 release out, I
have the following priorities:
1. Some performance issues.
2. Lazy activation.
3. Fragments.
No timeline on these, but that is the order in which I will attack them
along with everything else.
-> richard
