I like this nested grouping. If you decide to keep the structure flat, it would still be useful to prefix the directory names with ivy-, eclipse- to indicate where they belong.
Derek 2009/7/14 David Savage (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730726#action_12730726] > > David Savage commented on FELIX-1357: > ------------------------------------- > > Suggestion to move to a nested directory structure that looks like: > > $felix-svn/sigil/build.xml > $felix-svn/sigil/common/core/... (was > $felix-svn/sigil/org.cauldron.bld.core) > $felix-svn/sigil/ivy/plugin/... (was $felix/sigil/bld-ivy) > $felix-svn/sigil/eclipse/core (was $felix-svn/sigil/org.cauldron.sigil.core > $felix-svn/sigil/eclipse/ui (was $felix-svn/sigil/org.cauldron.sigil.ui > ... > > This way if/when we bring in support for other tools such as netbeans, > maven we can put the src under appropriate sub dirs? Of course could also > apply the YAGNI principle and keep a flat top level directory structure? > > > > Simplify sigil directory structure - get rid of redundant information > from directory names > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Key: FELIX-1357 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1357 > > Project: Felix > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: Sigil > > Reporter: David Savage > > Priority: Minor > > > > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
