On 9/10/09 1:18, Angelo van der Sijpt wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/9/10 Angelo van der Sijpt <angelo.vandersi...@luminis.nl>
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:00 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 9/9/09 12:54, Angelo van der Sijpt wrote:
+1 (very non-authoritive)
We checked the new release against our OSGi testing framework (
http://opensource.luminis.net/wiki/display/OSGITEST/OSGi+testing+framework
), and found nothing bad.
It's a shame about the new OSGi-provided filter implementation, by
the
way...
Why is that?
In some corner cases, the OSGi implementation might conclude that a
filter
is invalid, while it is actually permitted by the production rules. For
instance, (!ab=a) states an attribute name of '!ab', which is not
disallowed
by spec, and solved correctly by Felix' filter implementation. The
provided
one assumes that any ! after a ( will signal a negation, and
complain that
it requires a ( .
have you raised a bug for this over at
https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi ?
Bug filed as https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 .
Great. This bug will probably not be addressed for a while, but at least
it is on our radar...if you want to submit a patch to the filter impl,
we could potentially include it in a future build of Felix.
-> richard
Angelo
