On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 16:59, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote: > +1 > > Future releases should probably depend on the official OSGi JARs, not our > deprecated JARs.
I've raised a jira for that. > > I also noticed some of the used vs. includes (e.g., commands launcher) in > the NOTICE file were not completely accurate, but apparently this is > unnecessary anyway...we still need to finalize how we are going to do this > in the future. > > -> richard > > p.s. For this release, I think we should make the individual bundles > available from the download page, rather than the single source release. Or maybe both. > On 11/17/09 8:16, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> I've uploaded a release candidate for Gogo 0.2.2 which solves the >> following issues: >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1671 >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1858 >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-005/ >> >> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the >> signatures: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >> >> Usage: >> sh check_staged_release.sh 005 /tmp/felix-staging >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
