Hi, On 09.02.2010 20:13, Karl Pauls wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> It looks like the framework and bundlerepository do not follow our >> convention of using even release numbers (not a big issue and certainly >> not a showstopper), but something to care for the next releases to come. > > Do we have the convention for micro releases too? We never followed > that for any release I did... Only for minor release numbers its the > odd/even game but not for micro releases no?
The point is that discrepancy between Maven's version number interpreation of x.y.z-SNAPSHOT and OSGi's interpretation of the converted number x.y.z.SNAPSHOT. In Maven the SNAPSHOT version is "lower" than the x.y.z release version. In OSGi the SNAPSHOT version is higher. Therefore we started a convetion of having odd SNAPSHOTs (like 1.4.3-SNAPSHOT) and even releases (like 1.4.4) to ensure proper linearity. I initially proposed this for micro version only, Richard extended this to minor versions. To me it is mostly important, that the release version is higher than a SNAPSHOT version in OSGi understanding... Regards Felix > > regards, > > Karl > >> Regards >> Felix >> >> On 07.02.2010 22:30, Karl Pauls wrote: >>> I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: >>> >>> shell 1.4.2 >>> bundlerepository 1.4.3 >>> framework 2.0.3 >>> framework.security 1.0.0 >>> main 2.0.3 >>> >>> Staging repository: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-001/ >>> >>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the >>> signatures: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >>> >>> Usage: >>> sh check_staged_release.sh 001 /tmp/felix-staging >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >> > > >
