Sounds good. I did not really envision to use this subproject as a real bundle either. To ensure that we may want to not release it as a bundle but a plain jar.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:32, Marcel Offermans <[email protected] > wrote: > Hello Guillaume, > > Great initiative. I think its good to have a common toolbox to get utility > classes from. > > On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:49 , Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > Also, now is the time to refactor those classes as needed, once they'll > be > > release, it'll be a bit more difficult to incorporate major refactoring. > > I am wondering if a collection of utility classes ever will have a "stable > API". My personal preference would be to release this as a library from > which individual bundles can take classes or packages, but not as a bundle > which exports its whole contents. > > If a project then decides to share amongst a set of bundles what they take > from this toolbox, that's their responsibility. > > Or at least do it like this until we are confident we have a "stable API". > > Greetings, Marcel > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
