+1,

Regards,

Clement 


On 03.09.2010, at 10:53, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

> +1
> 
> Carsten
> 
> Karl Pauls  wrote
>> +1
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> Karl
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> The DEPS file for Manipulator mentions Apache software in the "Used
>>> Third-Party Software" section, but Apache software isn't third party since
>>> this is an Apache release. For Apache software we have a single catch all at
>>> the beginning of the DEPS file. Not a big deal, though.
>>> 
>>> -> richard
>>> 
>>> On 8/29/10 6:08, Clement Escoffier wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to call a vote on a couple of iPOJO sub-projects releases. The
>>>> following issues have been addressed:
>>>> - FELIX-2420 Enum support for @Property annotation
>>>> - FELIX-2430 IPOJO manipulation (ant task) results in invalid classes
>>>> throwing java.lang.VerifyError at runtime in InstanceManager (line 584)
>>>> - FELIX-2461 Allow specifying the targeted service interface in the
>>>> @ServiceController
>>>> - FELIX-2485 Improve the performance of the manipulator on large files
>>>> - FELIX-2542 Annotations on methods parameters are not moved on public
>>>> methods after manipulation
>>>> - FELIX-2561 Properties set as required instead of optional in  the
>>>> component type descriptions
>>>> 
>>>> Three sub-projects are impacted:
>>>> - Apache Felix iPOJO Core
>>>> - Apache Felix iPOJO Manipulator
>>>> - Apache Felix iPOJO Annotations
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Staging repository:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-155/
>>>> 
>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
>>>> signatures:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>> 
>>>> Usage: sh check_staged_release.sh 155 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>> 
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziege...@apache.org

Reply via email to