[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13013681#comment-13013681
 ] 

Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-2895:
----------------------------------------

Just keep in mind, the two are not equivalent. getResources() will take into 
account imported packages and required bundles too, not just local content and 
fragments. findEntries() will only take into account local content and 
fragments.

I'm not sure what you want to achieve, I'm just making observations.

> Allow the use of a property to tell SCR to always discover Service Component 
> files even if there's no wildcard in the name
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2895
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2895
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Justin Edelson
>         Attachments: FELIX-2895.patch, FELIX-2895_take2.patch
>
>
> The current version of SCR will use the API method getResource() to get the 
> service component descriptor if the Service-Component header does not contain 
> a wildcard. This precludes the discovery of DS components in attached 
> fragment bundles. From the DS spec:
> Section 112.4:
> Component descriptions are defined in XML documents contained in a bundle
> and any attached fragments.
> Section 112.4.1:
> The last component of each path in the Service-Component header may use
> wildcards so that Bundle.findEntries can be used to locate the XML document
> within the bundle and its fragments....
> A Service-Component manifest header specified in a fragment is ignored by
> SCR. However, XML documents referenced by a bundle's Service-Component
> Note the use of the word "may" in the first sentence. It does not say that 
> findEntries() should/must *only* be used if there's a wildcard.
> As such, I believe this is within the spec, albeit not backwards compatible 
> which is why I'm proposing to use a framework property.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to