2011/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <m...@farewellutopia.com>: > Well, the old annotations could also be improved so that FELIX-2892 > and the (probably duplicate) FELIX-3187 could be resolved. > > These issue would need changing the retention level Yepp, this will be done
> and adding the > bind-methods in the bytecode instead of in the java source. They are added in the bytecode already Carsten > > Reto > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> > wrote: >> 2011/11/28 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>: >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> >>> wrote: >>>> ...Going forward I see the following changes, we might want to apply to >>>> the SCR plugin:... >>> >>>> ...* Add support for the new OSGi standard annotations, of course. >>>> >>>> * Consider supportig mixing Felix and standard annotations in the same >>>> class (not a requirement but might be helpful -- or confusing ;-) )... >>> >>> Should the Felix annotations also be deprecated? >>> >>> It's probably good, medium-term, for everybody to move to the new >>> standard annotations. >> >> In theory, yes - but the standard annotations lack a lot of features >> we have (like metatype support) and they are slightly different to >> use. So we won't deprecate our cool annotations yet :) >> >> Regards >> Carsten >> >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> cziege...@apache.org >> > -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
