[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13162062#comment-13162062
 ] 

Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-3160:
----------------------------------------

I was able to recreate and I've determined what is happening.

Basically, the framework auto-refreshes the bundle when you do an uninstall 
(since no one depends on it), then your worker explicitly refreshes the 
uninstalled bundle once it receives the UNINSTALLED event, but at this time the 
bundle has already been refreshed and is now stale. That's why the content is 
already null, since we end up refreshing a stale bundle.

During the refactoring for the the R4.3 API, we must have lost a check 
somewhere that avoided this situation. I believe the proper thing to do here is 
to just ignore stale bundles when refreshing. I'll investigate whether this is 
the correct behavior and, if so, will implement a fix.
                
> NPE in BundleRevisionImpl.close() when uninstalling a bundle
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-3160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3160
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: framework-4.0.0
>            Reporter: Rob Walker
>            Assignee: Rob Walker
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: framework-4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: Activator.java, Felix3160.zip
>
>
> There seems to be a case where m_content can be null when uninstalling a 
> bundle, causing the following code to throw an NPE:
>     synchronized void close()
>     {
>         try
>         {
>             resolve(null);
>         }
>         catch (Exception ex)
>         {
>             ((BundleImpl) m_bundle).getFramework().getLogger().log(
>                 Logger.LOG_ERROR, "Error releasing revision: " + 
> ex.getMessage(), ex);
>         }
>         
>        m_content.close();
> I've added a simple check for null around the close in my version to avoid 
> the exception, which I'll check in.
> I'm not sure of the scenarios where this can legally be null at this point, 
> and whether there's some nastier underlying circumstance that needs 
> investigating. We see it under the following circumstances:
> * we register a listener that looks for framework STARTED
> * when triggered, this iterates all bundles and performs an uninstall on ones 
> which we determine are zombies leftover from a previous run
> Aside from the fact we're calling uninstall from inside an event handling 
> method, there doesn't anything else unusual about this code.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to