On Jan 4, 2012, at 15:13 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 1/4/12 07:44 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> Am 04.01.2012 um 13:39 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
>>> It would be nice to learn how they intend to solve this issue before we do, 
>>> because it probably makes sense to align our decision with theirs.
>> They will create two builds. This would be my option (c).
> 
> I don't think that has been decided.
> 
> From my understanding (and preference), they will maintain 1.4 source 
> compatibility by compiling against foundation, but target Java 5 in binary. 
> With this approach, the majority of people using modern JVMs will be able to 
> use the produced artifacts "as is", while people running on 1.4 will need to 
> recompile. You could do something similar.

Then the question remains: do we provide more than one artifact, or do we tell 
everybody that still wants 1.4 compatibility to "compile it themselves"?

Greetings, Marcel

Reply via email to