[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-3377:
-------------------------------------
Attachment: FELIX-3377-4-fmeschbe.patch
Updated patch based on FELIX-3337-4.diff :
- use MethodResult to convey the result of the methods
- only support Map as a result (in line Map being used to convey
configuration to activate)
- Properly differentiate between null-result (reset service properties) and
void (no action)
- Created a new namespace required to support the new functionality
(components with older namespaces are not allowed to return Map)
- updated the testcase for the new namespace
My own patch from May 5th is non-functional.
> Allow a component to update its own service properties
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3377
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Declarative Services (SCR)
> Affects Versions: scr-1.6.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Attachments: FELIX-3377-2.diff, FELIX-3377-3.diff,
> FELIX-3377-4-fmeschbe.patch, FELIX-3377-4.diff,
> FELIX-3377-returnDictionary.patch, FELIX-3377.diff
>
>
> If you just register a service in code, you can give the ServiceRegistration
> to the service and it can update its service properties to reflect what it
> can discover about its environment. This proposes that services registered
> through DS should be able to do this too, by calling an
> updateProperties(Dictionary) method on the ComponentContext. (Since we'd
> need a spec update to add the method to ComponentContext, I added a new
> interface that ComponentContextImpl implements).
> Right now a service could get Config Admin and modify the properties there,
> but then (a) the update method is called even though the component itself
> initiated the changes and (b) the new property values are persisted which is
> presumably not desired.
> According to the spec config admin properties override default property
> values specified in the component xml. I think that in order to reduce
> confusion, once a property has been set through config admin it should not be
> possible to update it through this update method. This also makes
> implementing this idea easy.
> IIUC this idea does not make sense for component factories.
> This idea was originally suggested by Erin Schnabel in OSGI bug 2250.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
