DS 1.2: AFAIK we've completely implemented the DS 1.2 spec. I don't really understand the location binding and targeted PID bits.
Java 5: I'm certainly happy with not temporarily removing the java 5-isms, but I could still do it if anyone else asks. I havent' done any basic housekeeping like removing the pre-java-5 concurrency compatibility code. I have no strong feeling about releasing with or without this stuff. thanks! david jencks On Oct 31, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi > > Am 31.10.2012 um 19:54 schrieb David Jencks: > >> I updated the changelog from the svn log.... hopefully I didn't miss >> anything. > > Just updated the changelog from the JIRA release notes. > > Another question crossing my mind: Since the current state passes the most > recent CT and checking the changes section in the 4.3 compendium spec I would > assume this version also implements Version 1.2 of the DS spec. Correct ? > > The only thing not fully implemented for the most recent specs is support for > the most recent Configuration Admin features like relaxed location binding > and targetted PIDs. I can live with that. > > Regards > Felix > >> >> waiting for advice on the other two questions.... >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Oct 31, 2012, at 8:44 AM, David Jencks wrote: >> >>> At the moment the code uses some java 5. How important is it that this >>> release not require java 5? It would not be very difficult to remove the >>> java 5-isms and put them back after the release. >>> >>> I've been marking defects as applying to and fixed in scr-1.8.0. I guess >>> we should go back and change them to 1.6.2? >>> >>> I have not been maintaining the changelog.... that will be a bit of work. >>> >>> If I don't discover any giant problems before we get the above done I'm >>> fine with a release. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 3:05 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I see the current trunk build passes our own as well as the OSGi CT tests >>>> and there are no open issues marked with 1.6.2. >>>> >>>> Shall I go ahead and cut a release ? >>>> >>>> This would IMHO also enable David to continue his refactorings. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Felix >>> >> >
