Felix Meschberger created FELIX-3743:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Potential endless loop setting the active framework 
startlevel
                 Key: FELIX-3743
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3743
             Project: Felix
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Framework
    Affects Versions: framework-4.0.2
            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
             Fix For: framework-4.2.0


We experience an issue with setting the framework startlevel in the 
Felix.setActiveStartLevel(int, FrameworkListener[]) method.

On line 1216 the bundle lock is acquired. If this fails with an 
IllegalStateException the loop just continues. But the bundle remains in the 
m_startLevelBundles set and is retried later. In the case of an uninstalled 
bundle, this situation will not change and the method is probabl going into an 
endless loop.

Would it make sense to remove the bundle from the m_startLevelBundles set in 
the catch block starting line 1223 if the bundle has been uninstalled ?

Proposed patch:

Index: Felix.java
===================================================================
--- Felix.java  (revision 1404016)
+++ Felix.java  (working copy)
@@ -1227,6 +1227,14 @@
                                Logger.LOG_ERROR,
                                "Error locking " + 
tuple.m_bundle._getLocation(), ex);
                        }
+                        else
+                        {
+                            synchronized (m_startLevelBundles)
+                            {
+                                m_startLevelBundles.remove(tuple);
+                                bundlesRemaining = 
!m_startLevelBundles.isEmpty();
+                            }
+                        }
                        continue;
                    }


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to