I've tested the snapshot, both in a personal project and in Apache ACE, and it works nicely, so no objections from me.
Greetings, Marcel On Sep 12, 2013, at 15:50 PM, Jan Willem Janssen <janwillem.jans...@luminis.eu> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I think it's time for a new release of the HTTP implementation. Are > there any objections to this? Any urgent issues that *must* be fixed? > > - -- > Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards > > Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect > +31 631 765 814 > > /My world is revolving around PulseOn and Amdatu/ > > Luminis Technologies B.V. > J.C. Wilslaan 29 > 7313 HK Apeldoorn > +31 88 586 46 30 > > http://www.luminis-technologies.com > http://www.luminis.eu > > KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93 > BTW (VAT) NL8169.78.566.B.01 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSMcaJAAoJEKF/mP2eHDc4r4YQANFI+u+aXsrS1uL2FGH94/UW > VmsENLQJ+W4wkG5fQcQljernHM6XE1ckSoX4RYrimSuPbSiTKLbgGHe31sBGjtcX > kSYCtG5Qr8iG4ViZstUp/wTJAbMwj9sVyN2OrsOJWgZINyPhhF23En2Tr8+qQm4n > RKv7c/LgEbL9+J/irzfbf/GcUSkjQtQM6BolIfOZwlqtm6QQF4odeiuh3YlK/3uE > Or78PUCLZjePa5M8fn5OXi/khh+YZ2q/cUcUvHUr4sPn5fgVzjG85jLwj5K4UBcW > Q570rwmDNh64y8MtXEPvemQ53WMxm+GZzaHL5CBY8cNT7VC9fHWl9YNYui8Q97Kq > yFHgKVol2B+cxLKlcGHVGmLPrGSI7XuoP95slflc507QpshxqQ6yWn6dUAg8y6oN > aFWjrie2RcRjAGtXivHmqD7zEzaZDidrIYILI+9hJCdEk6R5e2swl0bDP5WAFqVk > PVtTpbDzXaDfdOA51pdKGDA667zZxIy8WEUZ5fajkOubm15xqw8cYiniLq0Nyfoz > GldSaGVJdIQpXUMBHCjTMdnrHk1oo3+o3lSXEIZePj6v/1MRzT5tD6tzKAkAHQrs > E4Mr/PWpYazBjwbjF7vHA6/wqzvn/ZGXJFcPfPFlw9f+OooomfQRHYKxoUngwXKr > 9oLFWrUUlQTKfDOJX0oh > =L44K > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
