I don't have any problem reverting my fix if you have a better one ;-)
2014-01-18 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > I hope that someone cleans up the mess around > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3687 > and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4190 > before a release candidate. > > In the first issue I proposed a patch, Richard pointed out a problem, and > I suggested a possible solution and haven't gotten any comments. > > In the 2nd issue Guillaume committed a fix that is invalid and AFAIK it > has not been corrected. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jan 17, 2014, at 8:40 AM, David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 17 January 2014 16:16, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 for a new framework release, it would be great to have full R5 > support, > >> but if that is not supposed to happen soon > > > > Full disclosure: > > I tried my hand on those resolver related open issues, but had the > > feeling that I didn't understand the Felix code well enough for it. > > The resolver is a pretty complex beast, especially since it's > > recursive/re-entrant and I found that fixing one little issue would > > cause tons of other things to fall over elsewhere ;) In the end I > > often came up with a patchwork of fixes for one resolver CT test > > failure where I had the feeling that it could be done more elegantly. > > > > so in the end I abandoned my attempts here... I think those remaining > > resolver issues are for someone who really knows the felix resolver > > code inside out :) > > > > Cheers, > > > > David > >
