The copyright seems out of date (still points to 2011).

The notice does say we include OSGi stuff - are we? IIrc, we are not
supposed to put stuff in the NOTICE that isn't required - hence, if we
don't include something from OSGi we should fix this (I'd be ok with fixing
it in trunk).

+1 (provided we get the include OSGi stuff resolved by either "it does
include" or "fixed in trunk").

regards,

Karl




On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote:

> We're still missing a binding vote afaik ...
>
>
> 2014-06-14 11:09 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>:
>
> > I'm calling a vote on Felix Gogo Runtime 0.12.1.
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1020/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1020 /tmp/felix-staging
> >
> > Changes:
> > ** Bug
> >     * [FELIX-4533] - Gogo runtime does not advertise published services
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume
> >
>



-- 
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls

Reply via email to