[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14265755#comment-14265755
 ] 

Clement Escoffier commented on FELIX-4745:
------------------------------------------

Patches are the usual way for iPOJO. As our code is on SVN (and as I don't use 
the github mirrors), PR would be useless.

> Support for aspectj advice static method
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-4745
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4745
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: iPOJO
>    Affects Versions: ipojo-manipulator-1.12.0, ipojo-manipulator-1.12.1
>            Reporter: Olivier NOUGUIER
>            Assignee: Clement Escoffier
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 0001-FELIX-4745-naive-fix.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> When using aspectj to weave classes prior to iPojo packaging, injected advice 
> are ignore by iPojo bytecode manipulation.
> Then NPE are thrown in the advice because of the lazy initialization 
> mechanism of @Requires services.
> In my usecase, I want to weave @Transactional springframework aspect in iPojo 
> component. 
> Code generated:
> static final String updateName_aroundBody0(SignupTestDao ajc$this, String 
> name) {
>   LOGGER.info(*ajc$this.testDao*);
>   for (Test test : *ajc$this.testDao*.findAll()) {
>     test.setName(name);
>     *ajc$this.testDao*.update(test);
>     if (name.equals("boom")) {
>       throw new RuntimeException("boom");
>     }
>   }
>   return "done";
> }
> Code expected:
> static final String updateName_aroundBody0(SignupTestDao ajc$this, String 
> name)
> {
>   LOGGER.info(*ajc$this.__gettestDao()*);
>   for (Test test : *ajc$this.__gettestDao()*.findAll()) {
>     test.setName(name);
>     *ajc$this.__gettestDao()*.update(test);
>     if (name.equals("boom")) {
>       throw new RuntimeException("boom");
>     }
>   }
>   return "done";
> }
> A naive fix is to apply iPojo bytecode manipulation to static methods... see 
> the patch provided.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to