Ftr, the reason is that with OSGi versions, 1.8.3 < 1.8.3.SNAPSHOT so in order to have the snapshot version being actually lower that the release, we need to bump the version to 1.8.4.
2015-04-15 14:19 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > Hi Christian, > > as a reminder, Simon is right and follow the Felix release policy. > > The SNAPSHOT is x.x.x-SNAPSHOT and the release will be x.x.x+1. > > So 1.8.3-SNAPSHOT will result to 1.8.4 release. > > I don't remember the reason why, but it's the current policy ;) > > Regards > JB > > > On 04/15/2015 02:03 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > >> Hi Simon, >> >> your mail subject is a bit confusing. I guess you want config admin >> 1.8.4 released but the subject mentions 1.8.3. >> Do you think this is related to a bug I just created today for karaf >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-3668 ? >> It seems to be quite similar. >> >> I also consider this a very important issue as it would delay the karaf >> 4 release. >> >> I will try to apply your change and test if it also solves my problem. >> >> Christian >> >> On 15.04.2015 12:17, Simon Chemouil wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since I've seen a bunch of these discuss / release threads lately, I >>> thought I'd propose one as well ;). >>> >>> Jens Offenbach reported FELIX-4851[1] a few days ago which has been a >>> blocker for us both (separately) to use Felix SCR + Config Admin in >>> production. >>> >>> It is a critical bug that prevents using Felix ConfigAdmin >>> implementation to create DS components safely. It's a tricky problem to >>> debug so who knows how many more experienced it? The same program can >>> work on some machines or OSes and not on others, depending on how much >>> time a bundle needs to go from states STARTING to ACTIVE (e.g, a recent >>> mail "ConfigAdmin 1.8.2 does not call ManagedServiceFactory updates >>> method" by Balazs Zsoldos in which he states his code doesn't work on >>> Windows but works on Linux; and works when the configuration is updated >>> again; that might be the cause?). >>> >>> As far as I know there have been a few other fixes that would be nice to >>> see released, but this is the main blocker that imo justifies a release. >>> >>> I'm not a committer on Felix so I can't propose to apply the patch and >>> cut the release, but maybe someone will step up? :-) >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4851 >>> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
