Personally I think that any unnecessary bloat in a Felix release should be removed, so my suggestion would be to redo the release without these files...
On 20 April 2015 at 15:36, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, the idea is that these packages should be provided by the security > provider (as they are just bloat without it). The work on getting the > resolver separated apparently did drag in some additional osgi core > packages due to the transitivity of maven deps which get picked up because > we use org.osgi.service.* in the bnd rule. I guess we could just remove > them in the next release and don't worry about it for now but on the other > hand we might get people to depend on them being delivered by the framework > (i.e., we maybe should redo this release) - thoughts? > > regards, > > Karl > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:14 PM, David Bosschaert < > david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I noticed that this release now contains the following two packages >> that it previously didn't: >> >> org.osgi.service.condpermadmin >> org.osgi.service.permissionadmin >> >> Is that the intention? >> >> Thanks, >> >> David >> >> On 20 April 2015 at 14:22, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases: >> > >> > resolver 1.2.0 >> > framework 5.0.0 >> > main 5.0.0 >> > main.distribution 5.0.0 >> > >> > The main changelogs are in jira and at: >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.resolver-1.2.0/doc/changelog.txt >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.framework-5.0.0/doc/changelog.txt >> > >> > Staging repositories: >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1062/ >> > >> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the >> > signatures: >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >> > >> > Usage: >> > sh check_staged_release.sh 1062 /tmp/felix-staging >> > >> > Please vote to approve this release: >> > >> > [ ] +1 Approve the release >> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >> > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > karlpa...@gmail.com > http://twitter.com/karlpauls > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
